Ever since I got her Molly has been bad about itching/scratching excessively, especially around her paws. I switched her over to grain free food right after I got her, and try to do wheat/soy/corn free treats whenever possible. She gets the occasional rule-breaking treat from friends and clerks at the liquor store, etc, which I don't sweat too much since they never seem to affect her poorly.
The food change didn't seem to make much difference, and I am suspecting allergies to plants (probably grass) since it seems to be concentrated around the paws. Frequent bathing and use of anti-itch spray helps, but only to a point.
So, after I heard about mail-in doggie allergy testing I figured it was worth a try. I have friends that have gone to actual dog allergists and dermatologists, and if we can't contain it any other way I might have to do that eventually. But I thought the mail-in testing would at least help me realize what I was dealing with (food vs. environment, etc).
I went with the ImmuneIQ tests, they weren't the most highly reviewed that I found, but the price was reasonable ($45 after a Groupon deal) compared to some other options, and the reviews were generally decent. Honestly, the main criticism seemed to be that people didn't quite know what to do with the data, since it was either non-definitive (saying a dog was sensitive, but not outright allergic to an irritant) or included such a long list that they were overwhelmed.
In addition to the allergy test, they also offer some add-ons to test for molds & fungus, other toxins, and some common bacteria/viruses. I figured if I was going to do it, I might as well go all-in so purchased those in addition to the base test. I also opted for the express processing.
The kit itself came to me via priority mail. The company was located in Boulder so it came to me very quickly, although it took awhile before they shipped it after I placed the order (a week or so). The return shipping was to a lab in Las Vegas and via standard mail, so I assume it took longer but with no tracking there was no way to know (or even know if it made it safely).
I sent it off and then waited, my rush processing meant that I was supposed to get results within three days of it arriving at the lab. I sent it on a Friday, and figured with shipping and processing times I could expect results at the end of the following week, or possibly early the week after that if shipping was slower than I expected. On Wednesday of the week after I sent it, I received an email with my results.
I had about the same reaction that most of the reviews did, which was that the food stuff was marginally helpful but I wasn't really sure what to do with the 'marginal' middle column. Should I feed her that stuff or not? How hard should I try to completely avoid vs. minimize the right hand column? In my opinion, the company didn't do a great job communicating what the results meant. They had a disclaimer statement in there meant to help you interpret but really it wasn't super helpful.
I also did the add-on tests and those I was much less happy with. The bacteria and fungus tests listed a bunch of things, but a lot of them were just spores that are in the air everywhere or general bacteria that most dogs carry without incident and it wasn't clear if I should be at all worried that they showed up. There was one skin-related fungus that might be worth asking the vet about given her itching. I'll probably run the other results by the vet as well, although I imagine she'll be skeptical of the accuracy.
The toxin test was probably the most confusing of all, I really didn't know what to do with it. Have I unwittingly poisoned my dog with all the things in the right hand column? Or, is there some evidence of them and I should be careful to make sure I'm minimizing future exposure? Or, is this just indicating a susceptibility to those things, regardless of how much exposure has occurred? The information that came with the results was unclear...so I may have to research a bit. The radon was a bit concerning, since I do have radon in my house but have a mitigation system and have had it tested in the past with safe levels. Hopefully she's not somehow more sensitive to it or something.
The food result that was probably the most concerning was peas, since that seems to be in most dog foods. And I've been feeding her treats with peanut butter and oatmeal thinking those were safe alternatives to other wheat ingredients. I guess I will also have to stop the salmon oil supplement treats I've been giving her and try coconut oil instead. The other fish allergies don't bug me since I don't like fish myself and can't stand the smell so she doesn't get a ton of fish-related treats anyway.
She was allergic to grass, as I suspected, but other than that the environmental information wasn't very helpful. Also, according to this she appears to be allergic to herself (pet dander). But at least she's not allergic to me (human dander)!
VERDICT: I'm honesty not sure what to think about this. It's kind of information overload. I intend to follow the food results within reason, although I'm not sure yet if I'll switch her food, which does have some peas and salmon oil in it. The other results seem less helpful. I think if I did it again, I would definitely skip the toxin add-on and possibly the other add-ons as well.








